Global Analyses

The three analyses allow a deep exploration of values about the social choice problem, principally through information contained in the indicators.

The first analysis gave us a rapid picture about the social choice problem's main divergences. The second one allowed more detailed information about judgements and performance issues. Representative values by performance issue are identified through the mobilisation of indicators and complemented with the justification of their choice.

The identification and mobilisation of indicators gives a wide spectrum of values on the social choice problem. The judgments on indicators can confirm or segregate information on performance issues. Relevant characteristics expressed through indicators can also be classified according to their global impact among other indicators of each performance issue.

The third analysis complements and contrasts previous information. It allows an identification and comparison of indicator pertinence by performance issue. Hence, common indicators having direct pertinence can allow a selection of relevant information for the social choice problem. Moreover, lowest pertinences or none can also allow visualisation of possible deficiencies about previous indicator identification and possible needs for more information.

More analysis can be done then from the information and results presented for this case study. As this is an individual evaluation, results presented can be subjective. Hence, a multiple participant evaluation would allow extended analysis and judgements of the social choice problem.

Evaluation exercises on case studies can give a better comprehension of the social choice problem values and reinforce participants' analysis. Interactions within participants can show important points of debate that can be included in future evaluation processes.